Global trend meets U.S. at front door; public
debate on horizon.
With the global trend including women in
all military roles, the United States still struggles with the idea of
allowing women in ground combat, a closely watched, timely subject.
Valkyrie, by author Lindsay McKenna, takes
a realistic, in-depth look at how this might play out. Would it work?
Whose against it? Are women capable of being ground soldiers next to their
male counterparts?
The British Army has just undertaken a
one-year trial of women in combat to find out if they can do it, joining a
handful of other countries now allowing females in ground combat.
"I don't think the issue is women in
combat but is equal opportunity," says Captain Barbara Wilson, United
States Air Force retired, advocate for women in the military and founder
of the "American Women in Uniform" website, http://userpages.aug.com/captbarb.
Currently, 15 percent of jobs in the
military are off limits to women: ground combat and submarine duty.
Standards and training are often a subject
of debate, making serving one's country gender biased. However, McKenna
concedes that there is a certain type of woman that is prepared mentally,
emotionally, and physically for ground combat.
The woman should be able to physically meet
some type of standards requirements. McKenna suggests that the ideal woman
would be 5'7", 130 pounds, medium to large boned, and able to carry
weight. She should also enjoy physical activity and the outdoors.
Is ground combat for all women? McKenna
says "no."
"Whether or not women go into combat,
especially under a draft situation, should be determined by testing
physical requirements and the desire of individual women," says
McKenna. "Because of physical limitations, not all women are suited
to combat."
"Women who currently want the
opportunity to go into combat should not be denied."
Presently, U.S. military women cannot
achieve certain ranks, such as some admiral or general positions, because
they are not allowed to serve in combat assignments -- a needed
requirement for these standings. Rank, instead, is based upon gender, not
merit and ability.
Furthermore, women are not allowed the
necessary training to prepare for combat situations. For example, men are
allowed to go to war college, preparing them for combat strategy and
tactics. Women are not.
Fueling the debate is the fact that U.S.
women are already allowed in high-pressure, dangerous, and physical public
roles, such as firefighters, paramedics, EMTs, and police. Women lose
their lives in these positions, but are not allowed to serve their country
in combat military roles.
To learn more about women in combat and the
military, USA Today and The New York Times have many archived articles on
the subject, and Wilson's website, http://userpages.aug.com/captbarb/,
has comprehensive information and links.